Oliver Kopp
2014-10-21 13:53:26 UTC
Hello,
Cheers,
Oliver
I want to extend the biblatex support of Jabref.
Good to hear. Currently, no one is working on Biblatex support.The first step on my list is to implement the aliased entry fields in
biblatex. For example, if the 'journaltitle' is given then it also should be
displayed in the 'Journal' column in the big overview table.
I'm not using Biblatex. Is there really the concept of aliased fields? :)biblatex. For example, if the 'journaltitle' is given then it also should be
displayed in the 'Journal' column in the big overview table.
Similarly, the
information in the 'date' field should be used to construct the bibtexkey
(i.e. extract the year).
This can be customized in Options/Preferenzes/BibTeX key generator.information in the 'date' field should be used to construct the bibtexkey
(i.e. extract the year).
[...] Then one only has to go through the thousands or so
usages of getField and decide if the new 'withAlias'-method should be
invoked instead. Any ideas on this?
Seems reasonable :)usages of getField and decide if the new 'withAlias'-method should be
invoked instead. Any ideas on this?
After this is accomplished I would rework the BiblatexEntriesTypes (for
example, the year field is not required) and move the old bibtex fields
which possess an alias to a new tab 'Depreciated fields'.
OK.example, the year field is not required) and move the old bibtex fields
which possess an alias to a new tab 'Depreciated fields'.
Finally, the
cleanup method could be extended to convert an old entry to a new biblatex
entry.
Only in BibLaTeX mode, but sounds good!cleanup method could be extended to convert an old entry to a new biblatex
entry.
Cheers,
Oliver